What process should be established for any discrepancies in design documents during construction?

The correct answer highlights the importance of establishing a structured approach to handle discrepancies in design documents during construction through the "Meet and Confer Process." This process involves gathering the relevant parties—such as the design team, contractors, and project managers—to discuss the discrepancies collaboratively. The purpose is to identify the source of the discrepancies, evaluate their implications, and determine the best course of action for resolution.

Utilizing a "Meet and Confer Process" is crucial because it promotes communication and collaboration among stakeholders, ensuring that issues are addressed in a timely manner without escalating into disputes. This proactive engagement can lead to faster resolutions, minimizing delays and cost overruns associated with construction projects. It emphasizes the value of consensus and teamwork, allowing all parties to work towards a common goal and maintain project momentum.

In contrast, the other choices do not specifically address the collaborative aspects necessary for resolving discrepancies. Negotiation proceedings may be more formal and could lead to conflict, whereas a joint venture agreement pertains to the structural relationship between parties rather than specific problem resolution during construction. A conflict of interest review is focused on ethical considerations rather than the pragmatic resolution of document discrepancies.