What principle states that an owner cannot be put in a better position than if the breach hadn't occurred?

The principle that states an owner cannot be put in a better position than if the breach hadn't occurred is known as Betterment Theory. This concept is centered around ensuring that the remedy provided in the case of a breach does not allow the non-breaching party to gain an undeserved advantage or benefit. Instead, the goal is to restore the situation to what it would have been had the breach not taken place, thus protecting the interests of both parties involved.

In contracts and legal disputes, the emphasis on the Betterment Theory is critical as it serves to maintain fairness and prevent unjust enrichment. The owner, or the aggrieved party, should be compensated appropriately for losses incurred, but should not receive anything beyond what was originally agreed upon. This principle is foundational in contract law and helps to uphold the integrity of agreements between parties.

Other theories like Restitution focus on returning the benefit gained by one party at the expense of another, while Damages Theory pertains to the specific calculations of monetary compensation for losses suffered. Equity Theory deals with fairness in transactions but does not specifically address the restriction of receiving benefits beyond the original agreement.