According to tort law, what determines the liability in situations involving negligence?

In tort law, negligence is primarily determined by the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances. This involves evaluating the actions of individuals based on their professional training and conduct. In the context of negligence, if a professional holds a certain degree of qualifications or training and fails to meet the expected standard of care associated with that professional status, they can be found liable for negligence.

For instance, medical professionals are expected to adhere to specific standards based on their training. If they don't deliver care consistent with that training, resulting in harm to a patient, they may be held liable. This aligns with the principle that liability stems from a failure to act in accordance with the standards set for professionals within their field.

Other choices, while relevant in different contexts of law, do not primarily drive the determination of negligence liability. Intent to cause harm speaks to intentional torts rather than negligence. Failure to follow regulations may indicate negligence in some cases but is not as foundational as professional standards. Economic disadvantage does not inherently connect to the standards of care required under tort law regarding negligence; therefore, it does not determine liability in these cases.